About Your Council
Victorian Local Government Indicators
The following table outlines the City of Port Phillip's performance against the Victorian Local Government Indicators (VGLIs). All local governments within Victoria are required to assess their performance against these indicators and report the results in their annual report.
| Category |
Indicator |
Definitions |
Our |
Our Result 04/05 |
Our Result 05/06 |
Our Result 06/07 |
Our Result 07/08 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall performance |
Community satisfaction rating for overall performance generally of the council |
Council result from the Annual Community Satisfaction Survey for Local Governments (Chart One: Summary of Results - Result No. 1), coordinated by the Department for Victorian Communities - Local Government Victoria. |
69 % |
68 % |
69 % |
66 % |
62 % |
|
Advocacy |
Community satisfaction rating for council's advocacy and community representation on key local issues |
Council result from the Annual Community Satisfaction Survey for Local Governments (Chart One: Summary of Results - Result No. 4), coordinated by the Department for Victorian Communities - Local Government Victoria. |
68 % |
64 % |
69 % |
65 % |
51 % |
|
Engagement |
Community satisfaction rating for council's engagement in decision making on key local issues |
Council result from the Annual Community Satisfaction Survey for Local Governments (Chart One: Summary of Results - Result No. 5) coordinated by the Department for Victorian Communities - Local Government Victoria. |
67 % |
63 % |
64 % |
61 % |
51 % |
|
All rates |
Average rates and charges per assessment |
Rates and charges declared as being receivable, in the calculations for the adopted rates, at the beginning
divided by the number of assessments used in the calculation of the adopted rate (that is, when the rate was struck). |
$1,009 |
$1,037 |
$1,091 |
.
$1,181 |
$1,177 |
|
Residential rates |
Average residential rates and charges per assessment |
Rates and charges declared for all residential assessments (including vacant residential assessments) as defined in ¿all rates¿, except for residential assessments only, divided by the number of residential assessments used in the calculation of the adopted rate (that is, when the rate was struck). |
$820 |
$867 |
$953 |
$968 |
$966 |
|
Operating costs |
Average operating expenditure per assessment |
Operating expenditure per the statement of financial performance including asset sales and depreciation, divided by the number of assessments used in the calculation of the adopted rate (that is, when the rate was struck). NB: Where major factors of expenditure such as devaluations or transfers of assets are excluded, councils should provide a note explaining what has |
$1,796 |
$1,846 |
$1,879 |
$1,817 |
$1,871 |
|
Capital expenditure |
Average capital expenditure per assessment |
Amount capitalised to the statement of financial position and contributions by a Local Government to major assets not owned by the Local Government, including expenditure on:
divided by the number of assessments used in the calculation of the adopted rate (that is, when the rate was struck). N.B. Exactly what is included as capital expenditure will vary according to the Local Government's policy in defining the 'asset' and its 'life'. |
$391 |
$267 |
$301 |
$527 |
$549 |
|
Infrastructure |
Renewal |
Ratio of current spending on capital renewal of existing infrastructure assets which returns the service potential or the life of the asset to that which it had originally to the long-term AAAC*, divided by useful life, and totalled for each and every infrastructure asset to give one ratio. * The Average Annual Asset Consumption (AAAC) is the amount of a Local Government's asset base consumed during a year based on current replacement cost (that is, cost or fair value). |
101 % |
104 % |
75 % |
107 % |
67 % |
|
Infrastructure |
Renewal and maintenance |
Ratio of current spending on capital renewal of existing infrastructure assets which returns the service potential or the life of the asset to that which it had originally plus current spending on maintenance to AAAC* plus planned maintenance (that is, the expected level of maintenance which was used in the calculation of the useful life of the asset), divided by useful life, and totalled for each and every infrastructure asset to give one ratio. |
103 % |
109 % |
90 % |
107 % |
127 % |
|
Debts |
Average liabilities per assessment |
Total liabilities as per the statement of financial position less items held in trust (reflected in assets also held), divided by the number of assessments used in the calculation of the adopted rate (that is, when the rate N.B. Items held in trust does not include employee leave entitlements such as long service leave. |
$483 |
$406 |
$425 |
$421 |
$368 |
|
Operating result |
Operating result per assessment |
Bottom line per statement of financial performance, divided by the number of assessments used in the calculation of the adopted rate (that is, when the rate A note should be provided to this indicator explaining any major factors including their dollar amount, which have contributed to the result. For example, capital grants, developers contributions, revaluations of non current assets and what the result would be excluding these factors. N.B. Surpluses should be shown as positive and losses or deficits as negatives. |
$600 |
$94 |
$134 |
$346 |
$10.27 |
More Information
For more information, please contact the Governance and External Relations via eServices or phone ASSIST on (03) 9209 6777 or TTy (03) 9209 6713.

